Despite being immensely popular--and immensely lucrative—education is grossly overrated. In this explosive book, Bryan Caplan argues that the primary function of education is not to enhance students' skill but to certify their intelligence, work ethic, and conformity—in other words, to signal the qualities of a good employee. Learn why students hunt for easy As and casually forget most of what they learn after the final exam, why decades of growing access to education have not resulted in better jobs for the average worker but instead in runaway credential inflation, how employers reward workers for costly schooling they rarely if ever use, and why cutting education spending is the best remedy.
Caplan draws on the latest social science to show how the labor market values grades over knowledge, and why the more education your rivals have, the more you need to impress employers. He explains why graduation is our society's top conformity signal, and why even the most useless degrees can certify employability. He advocates two major policy responses. The first is educational austerity. Government needs to sharply cut education funding to curb this wasteful rat race. The second is more vocational education, because practical skills are more socially valuable than teaching students how to outshine their peers.

**Discussion Questions (by Grok)**

1. In "The Case Against Education," Bryan Caplan argues that much of higher education is inefficient and has a small effect on improving human capital. What evidence does Caplan provide to support this claim, and how does it challenge the conventional wisdom about the benefits of education?
2. Caplan suggests that a significant part of education is about signaling rather than enhancing skills or knowledge. How does the concept of signaling relate to the human capital model of education, and what are the implications of this distinction for the labor market and educational policy?
3. The book discusses the concept of "easy As" and how students often forget most of what they learn after exams. What does this say about the structure and purpose of the education system, and how might it be reformed to better serve students' needs and society's demands?
4. Caplan proposes that cutting education spending might be the best remedy for the issues he identifies. What are his main arguments for this policy, and what potential consequences might arise from such a drastic reduction in education funding?
5. The book addresses the issue of credential inflation and its impact on the labor market. How does credential inflation affect the value of degrees and the distribution of jobs among the population?
6. Caplan suggests that vocational education might be a more effective alternative to traditional education in many cases. What are his reasons for this proposal, and what might be the benefits and drawbacks of a shift towards more vocational education?
7. The book also discusses the role of education in promoting social mobility and reducing inequality. How does Caplan's analysis challenge the idea that education is a key tool for achieving these goals, and what alternative approaches might he suggest?
8. How does "The Case Against Education" contribute to our understanding of the purpose and effectiveness of education, and what implications does it have for the future of education policy and practice?

Ottawa Nonfiction Book Club

Science & Education

Critical Thinking

Book Club

History

Non-Fiction Writing

Intellectual Discussions

Current Events

The Case Against Education by Bryan Caplan

This content is available only to members

Share this event

Grow your community

The Case Against Education by Bryan Caplan

Details